Thought and Being

Going Back to Parmenides

Abstract

The question is that of the relationship between thought and being, considered in relation to another great question: that of the relationship between identity and difference. What we have tried to show is therefore why Parmenides could have thought that the multiple world is constituted as the manifestation of the same. That is, that in each of the distinct ones, it is always the same being that manifests itself. For this reason, we felt we had to question the so-called ontological difference thematized by Heidegger. Hence the radical problematic nature of the same difference between a concrete and an abstract conception of difference. As well as the difference between the determinacy and its existence. According to what is highlighted by the Trinitarian structure and its constitutive aporeticity. And from the free sound of its rhythm.